Screener
REZ vs IWB
iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.33% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than REZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REZ | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $843M | $46.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.6% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.1% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.19% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -44.15% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REZ and IWB
Explore further