Screener
RFCI vs APMU
ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF vs ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
Both RFCI and APMU are fixed income ETFs. RFCI charges 0.51% a year and APMU 0.35%. The main difference: APMU costs 0.16% less per year.
- APMU costs 0.16% less per year.
- APMU is much larger than RFCI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RFCI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFCI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFCI | APMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.51% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $232M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.53% | 2.65% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.28 | -0.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.52% | 2.40% |
| Max drawdown | -14.52% | -4.39% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.