Screener
RFFC vs APUE
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- APUE costs 0.17% less per year.
- APUE is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, APUE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | APUE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 0.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -18.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and APUE
Explore further