Screener
RFFC vs INVN
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Alger Russell Innovation ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.07% less per year.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; INVN uses index tracking.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | INVN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $11M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +13.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -26.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and INVN
Explore further