Screener
RFFC vs LOGO
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF
Key differences
Both RFFC and LOGO are equity ETFs. RFFC charges 0.48% a year and LOGO 0.69%. The main difference: RFFC costs 0.21% less per year.
- RFFC costs 0.21% less per year.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | LOGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $34M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.26% | 15.85% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -18.34% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.