Screener
RFG vs IJK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF vs iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IJK costs 0.18% less per year.
- IJK is significantly larger than RFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RFG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFG | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $329M | $10.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.50% | 17.09% |
| Max drawdown | -42.92% | -39.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFG and IJK
Explore further