Screener
RFG vs QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVMM costs 0.20% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RFG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFG | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $329M | $408M |
| Since | 2006 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.2% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.65% | 15.44% |
| Max drawdown | -42.92% | -24.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFG and QVMM
Explore further