Screener
RFV vs IJJ
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
Key differences
- IJJ costs 0.17% less per year.
- IJJ is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | IJJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $8.5B |
| Since | 2006 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.65% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +20.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.24% | 15.50% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -46.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and IJJ
Explore further