Screener
RFV vs KAUG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.44% less per year.
- RFV is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFV is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RFV follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $80M |
| Since | 2006 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.26% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -15.66% |
Similar to RFV and KAUG
Explore further