Screener
RFV vs SPHD
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- SPHD is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | SPHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2006 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.24% | 11.06% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -41.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and SPHD
Explore further