Screener
RGLO vs BFLX
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.09% less per year.
- RGLO covers north america markets; BFLX covers global.
- RGLO follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| RGLO | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $309M | — |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | 0.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RGLO and BFLX
Explore further