Screener
RGLO vs CHAT
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.26% less per year.
- CHAT is significantly larger than RGLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RGLO follows a index tracking strategy; CHAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| RGLO | CHAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $309M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +132.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +55.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 30.53% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -31.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RGLO and CHAT
Explore further