Screener
RGLO vs FFND
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.51% less per year.
- RGLO is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RGLO follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| RGLO | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $309M | $99M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RGLO and FFND
Explore further