Screener
RHRX vs HMOP
RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
Key differences
RHRX is an alternative ETF, while HMOP is a fixed income ETF. RHRX charges 1.38% a year and HMOP 0.29%.
- RHRX is an alternative fund, while HMOP is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RHRX follows a option income strategy; HMOP uses active selection.
- HMOP costs 1.09% less per year.
- HMOP is much larger than RHRX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHRX | HMOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $765M |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.9% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 0.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.75% | 2.66% |
| Max drawdown | -25.33% | -13.12% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.