Screener
RHRX vs SECT
RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- SECT costs 0.69% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than RHRX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RHRX is classified as alternative, while SECT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RHRX follows a option income strategy; SECT uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHRX | SECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 13.14% |
| Max drawdown | -25.33% | -38.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RHRX and SECT
Explore further