Screener
RIFR vs CGGE
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs Capital Group Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGE costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGGE is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; CGGE uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | CGGE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | 13.84% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -14.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and CGGE
Explore further