Screener
RIFR vs EXI
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Global Industrials ETF
Key differences
- EXI costs 0.20% less per year.
- EXI is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; EXI uses index tracking.
- EXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | EXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 15.98% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -39.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and EXI
Explore further