Screener
RIFR vs SLQD
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SLQD costs 0.53% less per year.
- SLQD is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR is classified as equity, while SLQD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RIFR covers global markets; SLQD covers north america.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; SLQD uses index tracking.
- SLQD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.25% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 1.49% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -12.69% |
Similar to RIFR and SLQD
Explore further