Screener
RINT vs SCHF
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF vs Schwab International Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHF costs 0.46% less per year.
- SCHF is significantly larger than RINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RINT | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $131M | $63.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.9% | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.85% | 15.72% |
| Max drawdown | -11.91% | -34.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RINT and SCHF
Explore further