Screener
RISN vs BSR
Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF vs Pacific Select Fund
Key differences
- RISN costs 0.37% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RISN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RISN | BSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 1.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $39M |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 1.02% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.9% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -21.88% | -15.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RISN and BSR
Explore further