Screener
RISN vs TUGN
Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.07% less per year.
- RISN is classified as mixed asset, while TUGN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RISN follows a active selection strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RISN | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $78M |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.9% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -21.88% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RISN and TUGN
Explore further