Screener
RKSG vs FAD
Ruk Strategic Growth ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- RKSG costs 0.13% less per year.
- FAD is significantly larger than RKSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RKSG | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $480M |
| Since | 2026 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.41% |
| Max drawdown | -1.85% | -37.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RKSG and FAD
Explore further