Screener
RLY vs FAAR
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
RLY is a fixed income ETF, while FAAR is an alternative ETF. RLY charges 0.50% a year and FAAR 0.98%.
- RLY is a fixed income fund, while FAAR is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RLY follows a active selection strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- RLY costs 0.48% less per year.
- RLY is much larger than FAAR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RLY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RLY | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $176M |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 9.19% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +33.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +11.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.38% | 13.49% |
| Max drawdown | -34.17% | -18.03% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.