Screener
RLY vs MATE
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
RLY is a fixed income ETF, while MATE is an alternative ETF. RLY charges 0.50% a year and MATE 0.97%.
- RLY is a fixed income fund, while MATE is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RLY follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- RLY costs 0.47% less per year.
- RLY is much larger than MATE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- RLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RLY | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $39M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.35% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.17% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.