Screener
RLY vs MYCN
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF vs State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- MYCN costs 0.35% less per year.
- RLY is significantly larger than MYCN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RLY is classified as mixed asset, while MYCN is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RLY follows a active selection strategy; MYCN uses index tracking.
- RLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RLY | MYCN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $9M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.84% | 4.97% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 4.56% |
| Max drawdown | -34.17% | -5.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RLY and MYCN
Explore further