Screener
RMIF vs DIVN
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF vs Horizon Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
RMIF is a fixed income ETF, while DIVN is an alternative ETF. RMIF charges 1.55% a year and DIVN 0.70%.
- RMIF is a fixed income fund, while DIVN is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RMIF follows a active selection strategy; DIVN uses option income.
- DIVN costs 0.85% less per year.
- DIVN is much larger than RMIF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| RMIF | DIVN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.55% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $155M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.29% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.65% | — |
| Max drawdown | -3.01% | -5.55% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.