Screener
RNEM vs FFEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
- FFEM costs 0.16% less per year.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNEM | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $39M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.4% | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | 21.16% |
| Max drawdown | -38.37% | -16.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNEM and FFEM
Explore further