Screener
RNRG vs EART
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- EART costs 0.06% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RNRG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNRG | EART | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $43M |
| Since | 2015 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.6% | +112.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +20.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.67% | 37.89% |
| Max drawdown | -58.79% | -53.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNRG and EART
Explore further