Screener
RNRG vs RSSL
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.57% less per year.
- RSSL is significantly larger than RNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RNRG covers global markets; RSSL covers north america.
- RNRG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNRG | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 1.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.6% | +45.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.67% | 19.27% |
| Max drawdown | -58.79% | -27.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNRG and RSSL
Explore further