Screener
ROAM vs DFAE
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
Key differences
- DFAE costs 0.15% less per year.
- DFAE is significantly larger than ROAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROAM follows a index tracking strategy; DFAE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROAM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROAM | DFAE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $106M | $8.9B |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 1.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +45.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.41% | 18.59% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROAM and DFAE
Explore further