Screener
ROBO vs CGGO
Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.48% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than ROBO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROBO | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $10.1B |
| Since | 2013 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.1% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.95% | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -43.65% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROBO and CGGO
Explore further