Screener
ROBO vs THNQ
Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF vs Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- THNQ costs 0.27% less per year.
- ROBO is significantly larger than THNQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROBO follows a active selection strategy; THNQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, THNQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROBO | THNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $322M |
| Since | 2013 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.1% | +68.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | +38.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | +17.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.95% | 25.96% |
| Max drawdown | -43.65% | -50.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROBO and THNQ
Explore further