Screener
RODM vs FLQS
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF vs Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Key differences
- RODM costs 0.06% less per year.
- RODM is significantly larger than FLQS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RODM covers global markets; FLQS covers north america.
- RODM follows a index enhanced strategy; FLQS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RODM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RODM | FLQS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $51M |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.81% | 1.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +12.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.77% | 15.31% |
| Max drawdown | -35.98% | -42.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RODM and FLQS
Explore further