Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ROE vs AGGA

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF

ROE

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF

Astoria Portfolio Advisors LLC

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$239M

AGGA

Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF

Astoria Portfolio Advisors LLC

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$76M

Key differences

  • ROE costs 0.06% less per year.
  • ROE is significantly larger than AGGA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • ROE is classified as equity, while AGGA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.

Side-by-side comparison

ROEAGGA
Annual cost (TER)0.49%0.55%
Fund size (AUM)$239M$76M
Since20232025
Dividend yield1.01%3.95%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+37.5%+5.3%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y14.02%2.16%
Max drawdown-19.10%-1.47%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ROE and AGGA