Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ROE vs DCOR

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF

ROE

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF

Astoria Portfolio Advisors LLC

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$239M

DCOR

Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.14%

Fund size

$3.0B

Key differences

  • DCOR costs 0.35% less per year.
  • DCOR is significantly larger than ROE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • ROE is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • ROE follows a active selection strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.

Side-by-side comparison

ROEDCOR
Annual cost (TER)0.49%0.14%
Fund size (AUM)$239M$3.0B
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.01%0.95%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionmulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+37.5%+30.9%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y14.02%11.99%
Max drawdown-19.10%-19.10%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ROE and DCOR