Screener
ROE vs QINT
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
Key differences
- QINT costs 0.15% less per year.
- ROE covers north america markets; QINT covers global.
- ROE follows a active selection strategy; QINT uses index tracking.
- QINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROE | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $239M | $590M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 2.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.5% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -19.10% | -33.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROE and QINT
Explore further