Skip to content
Screener

ROKT vs KBE

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF

ROKT

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$255M

KBE

State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.4B

Key differences

Both ROKT and KBE are equity ETFs. ROKT charges 0.45% a year and KBE 0.35%. The main difference: ROKT covers global markets; KBE covers North America.

  • ROKT covers global markets; KBE covers North America.
  • KBE costs 0.10% less per year.
  • KBE is much larger than ROKT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, ROKT has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • KBE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ROKTKBE
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$255M$1.4B
Since20182005
Dividend yield0.25%2.33%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+102.2%+24.4%
CAGR 3Y+44.3%+26.2%
CAGR 5Y+24.2%+5.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.490.89
Volatility 1Y29.83%21.74%
Max drawdown-43.16%-53.14%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ROKT and KBE