Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ROKT vs KOMP

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

ROKT

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$155M

KOMP

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$2.7B

Key differences

  • KOMP costs 0.25% less per year.
  • KOMP is significantly larger than ROKT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • ROKT covers global markets; KOMP covers north america.
  • Over the last 3 years, ROKT has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ROKTKOMP
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$155M$2.7B
Since20182018
Dividend yield0.30%1.60%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+134.6%+49.3%
CAGR 3Y+48.8%+22.5%
CAGR 5Y+28.2%+4.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.650.84
Volatility 1Y27.97%23.05%
Max drawdown-43.16%-50.06%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ROKT and KOMP