Screener
ROM vs IGM
ProShares Ultra Technology vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.56% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than ROM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROM follows a leveraged strategy; IGM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROM | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $961M | $9.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +126.3% | +55.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +58.4% | +39.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +29.7% | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.23% | 20.24% |
| Max drawdown | -67.55% | -40.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROM and IGM
Explore further