Screener
RONB vs AFSM
Baron First Principles ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- AFSM costs 0.25% less per year.
- RONB is significantly larger than AFSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RONB | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $94M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.84% |
| Max drawdown | -13.08% | -43.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RONB and AFSM
Explore further