Screener
RONB vs BCGD
Baron First Principles ETF vs Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF
Key differences
- BCGD costs 0.25% less per year.
- RONB is significantly larger than BCGD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RONB follows a active selection strategy; BCGD uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RONB | BCGD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $9M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.08% | -13.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RONB and BCGD
Explore further