Screener
RONB vs FTC
Baron First Principles ETF vs First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FTC costs 0.42% less per year.
- FTC is significantly larger than RONB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RONB follows a active selection strategy; FTC uses index tracking.
- FTC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RONB | FTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -13.08% | -34.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RONB and FTC
Explore further