Screener
RONB vs FTLS
Baron First Principles ETF vs First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Key differences
- RONB costs 0.38% less per year.
- FTLS is significantly larger than RONB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RONB is classified as equity, while FTLS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RONB follows a active selection strategy; FTLS uses long short.
- FTLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RONB | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.19% |
| Max drawdown | -13.08% | -20.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RONB and FTLS
Explore further