Screener
RONB vs IG
Baron First Principles ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.81% less per year.
- RONB is classified as equity, while IG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- IG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RONB | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $179M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.06% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.81% |
| Max drawdown | -13.08% | -23.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RONB and IG
Explore further