Screener
RONB vs SCHI
Baron First Principles ETF vs Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCHI costs 0.97% less per year.
- SCHI is significantly larger than RONB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RONB is classified as equity, while SCHI is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RONB follows a active selection strategy; SCHI uses index tracking.
- SCHI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RONB | SCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $10.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.03% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -13.08% | -20.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RONB and SCHI
Explore further