Screener
ROSC vs FLQL
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Key differences
- FLQL costs 0.19% less per year.
- FLQL is significantly larger than ROSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLQL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROSC | FLQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.87% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.4% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | 12.99% |
| Max drawdown | -43.13% | -33.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROSC and FLQL
Explore further