Screener
ROSC vs HQGO
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- ROSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROSC | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $48M |
| Since | 2015 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.87% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | 13.47% |
| Max drawdown | -43.13% | -20.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROSC and HQGO
Explore further