Screener
ROSC vs OSEA
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- ROSC costs 0.21% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than ROSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROSC covers north america markets; OSEA covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, ROSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROSC | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $497M |
| Since | 2015 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.87% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.5% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.76% | 15.20% |
| Max drawdown | -43.13% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROSC and OSEA
Explore further