Screener
RPG vs IUSG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
Key differences
- IUSG costs 0.31% less per year.
- IUSG is significantly larger than RPG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IUSG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IUSG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPG | IUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $30.1B |
| Since | 2006 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.1% | +34.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.0% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +15.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.62% | 15.81% |
| Max drawdown | -36.58% | -32.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPG and IUSG
Explore further