Screener
RPG vs XSHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- XSHQ costs 0.06% less per year.
- RPG is significantly larger than XSHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPG | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $246M |
| Since | 2006 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.1% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.0% | +12.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.62% | 17.54% |
| Max drawdown | -36.58% | -38.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPG and XSHQ
Explore further